پایان نامه تاثیر عوامل انگیزش یادگیری بر عملکرد یادگیری دانشجویان دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی

فهرست:

فهرست مطالب

عنوان                                                                                                                  صفحه

چکیده.......................................................................................................................................... 1

فصل اول:کلیات تحقیق............................................................................................................... 2

1-1- مقدمه................................................................................................................................. 3

1-2- شرح و بیان مساله پژوهشی.................................................................................................. 4

1-3- چارچوب نظری پژوهشی.................................................................................................... 7

1-4- اهمیت و ضرورت پژوهش............................................................................................. ...11

1-5- اهداف پژوهش................................................................................................................. 12

1-6- فرضیه‌های پژوهش........................................................................................................... 13

1-7- تعاریف مفهومی و عملیاتی متغیرهای پژوهش..................................................................... 13

1-7-1- تعاریف مفهومی متغیرها................................................................................................ 13

1-7-2- تعاریف عملیاتی متغیرها............................................................................................... 15

1-8- قلمرو پژوهش.................................................................................................................. 15

1-8-1- قلمرو موضوعی پژوهش............................................................................................... 15

1-8-2- قلمرو زمانی پژوهش.................................................................................................... 16

1-8-3- قلمرو مکانی پژوهش................................................................................................... 16

1-9- روش پژوهش.................................................................................................................. 16

فصل دوم:  بررسی ادبیات موضوعی تحقیق............................................................................ 17

2-1- مقدمه............................................................................................................................... 18

2-2- انگیزش یادگیری............................................................................................................... 18

2-2-1- تعریف انگیزش و انواع آن............................................................................................ 18

2-2-2- انگیزش یادگیری ونظریات مرتبط با آن.......................................................................... 20

2-2-3- عوامل انگیزش یادگیری................................................................................................ 22

2-2-3-1- شخصیت................................................................................................................ 23

2-2-3-1-1- رویکرد یادگیری اجتماعی.................................................................................... 24

2-2-3-1-2- رویکرد روانکاوی............................................................................................... 24

2-2-3-1-3- رویکرد پدیدار شناختی........................................................................................ 25

2-2-3-1-4- رویکرد صفات.................................................................................................... 26

2-2-3-2-عملکرد اساتید.......................................................................................................... 27

2-2-3-2- 1- شخصیت استاد.................................................................................................. 29

2-2-3-3- نفوذ همتایان............................................................................................................ 31

2-2-3-4- پشتیبانی و مشارکت خانواده..................................................................................... 35

2-2-3-5- امکانات یادگیری..................................................................................................... 36

2-2-3-5-1- ارتباطات با واسطه کامپیوتر (CMC).................................................................... 38

2-2-3-5-2- فن آوری های ارتباطی تلفن همراه در آموزش و پرورش....................................... 39

2-3- عملکرد یادگیری............................................................................................................... 41

2-3-1- تعریف یادگیری........................................................................................................... 41

2-3-2- رویکردهای یادگیری.................................................................................................... 42

2-3-3- یادگیری­ همسالان درمحیط اجتماعی فرهنگی.................................................................. 45

2-3-4- دیدگاه­های نظری پیرامون یادگیری و یادگیری همسالان................................................... 46

2-3-5-  مدل سیستم شناختی برای پردازش اطلاعات.................................................................. 48

2-4- پیشینه پژوهشی................................................................................................................ 49

2-4-1- پیشینه پژوهشی در ایران............................................................................................... 49

2-4-2- پیشینه پژوهشی درخارج از کشور.................................................................................. 50

فصل سوم: روش شناسی تحقیق.............................................................................................. 55

3-1- مقدمه............................................................................................................................... 56

3-2- روش پژوهش.................................................................................................................. 56

3-3- جامعه آماری.................................................................................................................... 56

3-4- حجم نمونه آماری و روش نمونه گیری............................................................................... 57

3-5- روش­ها و ابزارهای جمع آوری اطلاعات............................................................................ 57

3-5-1- ساختار پرسشنامه عملکرد یادگیری................................................................................ 58

3-5-2- ساختار پرسشنامه انگیزش یادگیری................................................................................ 58

3-6- روایی و پایایی پژوهش..................................................................................................... 58

3-6-1- روایی (اعتبار).............................................................................................................. 58

3-6-1-1- تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی جهت بررسی روایی سازه ابزار پژوهش..................................... 59

3-6-2- پایایی.......................................................................................................................... 60

3-7- روش تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها.............................................................................................. 61

فصل چهارم:تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها و یافته های تحقیق........................................................ 62

4-1- مقدّمه............................................................................................................................... 63

4-2-  یافته های توصیفی........................................................................................................... 63

4-2-1 - شاخص های توصیفی متغیرهای جمعیت شناختی........................................................... 63

4-2-1 -1- جنسیت................................................................................................................. 63

4-2-1 -2- وضعیت تاهل......................................................................................................... 64

4-2-1 -3- رشته تحصیلی........................................................................................................ 64

4-2-1 -4- وضعیت اشتغال...................................................................................................... 65

4-2-1 -5- سن....................................................................................................................... 65

4-2-1 -5- معدل..................................................................................................................... 66

4-2-2- شاخص های توصیفی متغیرهای پژوهش:....................................................................... 66

4-2-2-1- شاخص های توصیفی عملکرد یادگیری:.................................................................... 66

4-2-2-2- شاخص های توصیفی ابعاد انگیزش یادگیری:............................................................. 67

4-2-2-2-1- شخصیت دانشجو................................................................................................ 67

4-2-2-2-2- عملکرد اساتید.................................................................................................... 68

4-2-2-2-3- نفوذ همتایان....................................................................................................... 69

4-2-2-2-4- پشتیبانی و مشارکت خانواده................................................................................. 70

4-2-2-2-5- امکانات یادگیری................................................................................................. 71

4-3- یافته های استنباطی............................................................................................................ 72

4-3-1-  بررسی فرضیه های پژوهش:........................................................................................ 72

4-3-2- یافته های جانبی........................................................................................................... 84

4-3-2- 1- آزمون t  گروه های مستقل:..................................................................................... 85

4-3-2- 2- آزمون تحلیل واریانس:............................................................................................ 86

فصل پنجم:بحث و نتیجه گیری................................................................................................. 89

5-1- مقدمه............................................................................................................................... 90

5-2- یافته های توصیفی............................................................................................................ 90

5-3- تبیین یافته‌های پژوهش(یافته­های استنباطی)......................................................................... 94

5-4- پیشنهادات کاربردی.......................................................................................................... 98

5-5- پیشنهادات برای انجام پژوهش‌های آتی.............................................................................. 99

5-6- محدودیت‌های پژوهش................................................................................................... 100

فهرست منابع........................................................................................................................... 102

الف) منابع فارسی.................................................................................................................... 103

ب) منابع لاتین ....................................................................................................................... 105

پیوست.................................................................................................................................... 118

منبع:

منابع فارسی

آشتاب علی،(1392)،ضعف مهارت در فارغ التحصیلان دانشگاهی بر افزایش نرخ بیکاری،(30/09/1392)، خبرگزاری دانشجویان ایران(ایسنا)، http://www.isna.ir/fa/news/92093020641.

بهرامی مسعود،حسن زاده اکبر،میزان آمادگی فراگیران برای یادگیری از دیدگاه دانشجویان مقطع کارشناسی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اصفهان 1380، مجله ایرانی آموزش در علوم پزشکی،سال 1381،شماره 4،ص17-23.

حق جوی جوانمرد شقایق،منصوریان مرجان،بررسی عوامل مؤثر در یادگیری آگاهانه دانشجویان سال اول رشته های پرستاری دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اصفهان 1389،مجله ایرانی آموزش در علوم پزشکی زمستان 1389 ، 10(5)، ص675.

حسینی شهیدی لاله،عطاردی علیرضا،مقیمیان مریم،بررسی میزان به کارگیری راهبرد های مطالعه و یادگیری دانشجویان دانشکده علوم پزشکی گناباد82-1383،مجله دانشکده علوم پزشکی و خدمات بهداشتی در مانی گناباد،دوره 11،شماره 1،سال 1384،ص53-58.

رحمانی آزاد،محجل اقدم علیرضا،فتحی آذر اسکندر،عبدالله زاده فرحناز،مقایسه تأثیر آموزش برمبنای نقشه مفهومی با روش تلفیقی بر یادگیری درس فرآیند پرستاری دانشجویان پرستاری دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز 1384-1383،مجله ایرانی آموزش در علوم پزشکی،بهار و تابستان 1386،7(1)،ص41-46.

رسولی نژاد، سیداصغر و رسولی نژاد، سیدوحید.(1384).بررسی سبک یادگیری دانشجویان پیرا پزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی کاشان. مجله گام های توسعه در آموزش پزشکی،2(1)،27-32،ص27-30

سیف،علی اکبر(1380). روانشناسی پرورشی نوین. تهران:انتشارات آگاه.9،1390(29)،ص 348.

کلاهدوزی احمد،روش ها و فنون تدریس .چاپ اول .تهران: مرکز برنامه ریزی و تالیف کتابهای درسی ، معاونت آموزشی دانشگاه امام حسین ؛1386.ص.155.

لاتام، گری پی.(1389). انگیزش شغلی: تاریخچه، نظریه، پژوهش و عمل، ترجمه نشرین ارشدی. تهران: انتشارات جنگل،ص20-30.

موسوی سید حمید،جوادی رفعت،عوامل مؤثر در بهبود یادگیری دانشجویان از دید استادان دروس غیر بالینی رشته پزشکی عمومی دانشکده پزشکی بندر عباس 1390،مجله پزشکی هرمزگان سال 15،شماره دوم،تابستان 1390، ص123-12.

نبوی سید جمال الدین،عسگریان مهناز،عوامل مؤثر بر یادگیری در بین دانشجویان دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد پزشکی تهران 1383،سال 14،شماره 1،پاییز 1383،ص43-47.

نجات نازی،کوهستانی حمید رضا،رضایی کوروش،بررسی تأثیر نقشه مفهومی بر رویکرد های یادگیری دانشجویان پرستاری تهران سال 1390، مجله دانشکده پرستاری و مامایی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران،دوره 17،شماره 2،ص23-27.

پروچاسکا ، جیمز ، او ؛ نورکراس ، جان ، سی .(1381). نظریه های رواندرمانی . ترجمه سید محمدی ، یحیی . تهران :انتشارات رشد.ص356.

ب) منابع لاتین

Abouserie,Reda.(2009).Self-esteem and achievement motivation as determinants of   students  approaches to studying,5aug,19-26.

Abrami, P., &Bures, E. (1996). Computer-supported collaborative learning and distance education. The American Journal of DistanceEducation, 10 (2), 37–41.

Abrantes, J. L., Seabra, C., & Lages, L. L. (2007). Pedagogical affect student interest and learning performance. Journal of Business Research, 60, 960–964.

Ackerman, P. L. (1994). Intelligence, attention, and learning: Maximal and typical performance. In D. K. Detterman (Ed.), Current topics in human intelligence: Theories of intelligence(pp.1–27). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Alexander, P. A., & Murphy, P. K. (1999). Learner profiles: Valuing individual differences within classroom communities. In P. L. Ackerman, P. C. Kyllonen, & R. D. Roberts(Eds.), Learning and individual differences: Processes, traits, and content determinants (pp. 413-431). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: goals, structures, and student motivation.Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271.

Anderson, J. R. (1995).Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: Freeman.Bangert-Drowns, R., Kulik, C. L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61, 213-238.

Baker, E., Gearhart, M., & Herman, J. (1990). The Apple Classrooms of Tomorrow: 1990 UCLA Evaluation Study, UCLA Center for theStudy of Evaluation, Los Angeles.Barry, J. (2006). The effect of socioeconomic status on academic achievement. Baker, E. L., Gearhart, M., Herman, J. L., Tierney, R., & Whittaker, A. K.(1991). Stevens Creek portfolio project: Writing assessment in thetechnology classroom. Portfolio News, 2(3), 7-9.

Bastable SB. (2002) .Nurse as educator, principles of teaching and learning for nursing practice. 2nd ed. Boston: Jones and Bartlett Publishers. Busato, Vittorio. V., Prins, Frans. J., Elshot, Jan. J. & Hamaker Christiaan (1998) The relation between learning style, thebig five personality traits and achievement motivation in higher education. Journal of Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 129-140.

Barrett, T. (2001). Philosophical principles for problem based learning: Freire’s concepts of personal development and social empowerment. In P. Little, & P. Kandlbinder (Eds.) The power of problem-based learning: Refereed proceedings of the 3rd Asia Pacific Conference on PBL, 9-12 December, Newcastle, Australia: Problarc.

BBC. (2010). Students only have 10-minute attention span. BBC. Available at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/8449307.stm. Accessed 08.02.11.

Barrows H.S. & Tamblyn R.M. (1980) Problem-Based Learning: An Approach to Medical Education. New York:Springer Publishing Company, p.1.

Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (1999). Peer learning and assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(4), 413-426.

Boyle, A.B., Duffy, T. and Dunleavy, K. (2003). ‘Learning styles and academic out-come: the validity and utility of Vermunt’s Inventory of Learning Styles in a Britishhigher education setting’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 73, 263–290.

Bransford, J.D., and D. Schwartz 1999 Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education 24:61-100.

Brecht, H. D., &Ogilby, S. M. (2008). Enabling a comprehensive teaching strategy: Video lectures. Journal of Information Technology Education, 7, 71-86.

Brophy, H.E., Schiffman, R.F. & London Bocknek, E.(2011). Toddlers Social-emotional Competence in the contexts of Maternal Emotion Socialization and Contingent Responsiveness in a law-income Sample.Social Development, 20(1), 73-92.

Bullock, D.W., LaBella, V. P., Clingan, T., Ding, Z., Stewart, G., &Thibado, P. M. (2002). Enhancing the student-instructor interaction frequency. The Physics Teacher, 40, 535–541.

Bures, E., Abrami, P., & Amundsen, C. (2000). Student motivation to learn via computer conferencing.Research in Higher Education41(5),593-621.

Busato, V. V., Prins, F. J., Elshout, J. J., &Hamaker, C. (2000). Intellectual ability, learning style, personality,achievement motivation and academic success of psychology students in higher education.Personality and IndividualDifferences, 29, 1057–1068.

Busato, V.V., Prins, F.J., Elshout, J.J. and Hamaker, C. (1998). ‘Learning styles: Across-sectional and longitudinal study in higher education’, British Journal of Edu-cational Psychology 68, 427–441.

Busato, V.V., Prins, F.J., Elshout, J.J. and Hamaker, C. (1999). ‘The relation between learning styles, the Big Five personality traits and achievement motivation in higher education’, Personality and Individual Differences26, 129–140.

Caldwell, J. E. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom: current research and beast-practice tips. CBE Life Sciences Education, 6(1), 9–20.

Carlton, M., &Winsler, A. (1998). Fostering intrinsic motivation in early childhood classrooms.Early Childhood Educational Journal,25(3), 159–166.

Carrell, S., M. Page, and J. West. 2010. Sex and science: How professor gender perpetuates the gender gap. Quarterly Journal of Economics 125(3):1101–44.

Chen, C. M., & Wang, H. P. (2011). Using emotion recognition technology to assess the effects of different multimedia materials on learning emotion and performance. Library & Information Science Research,33(3),244-255.

Chen, C. M., Lee, H. M., & Chen, Y. H. (2005). Personalized e-learning system using item response theory. Computers and Education, 4 4(3), 237 – 255.

Chen, C. M., Liu, C. Y., & Chang, M. H. (2006) . Personalized curriculum sequencing using modified item response theory for web-based instruction. Expert Systems withApplications, 30(2), 378 – 396.

Chen, L. H. (2010). Web-based learning programs: use by learners with various cognitive styles.Computers and Education, 54, 1028 –1035.

Chen, S. Y., Fan, J., &Macredie, R. D. (2006) . Navigation in hypermedia learning         systems: experts vs. novices. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(2), 251 – 266.

Chih-Ming Chen, Distinguished Professor Chung-Hsin Wu(2014),Effects of different video lecture types on sustained attention, Emotion, cognitive load, and learning  performance,.Journal of computers & educationa,v(80),108-121.

Clark, M.C., et al., Team-based learning in an undergraduate nursing course. The Journal of nursing education, 2008. 47(3): p. 111.

Colvin, J. W. (2007). Peer tutoring and social dynamics in higher education. Mentoring and Tutoring, 15(2), 165-181.

Cooke, N. J. (1992). Predicting judgment time from measures of psychological proximity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18 (3), 640 – 653.

Cooke, N. J., &Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1988). Effects of computer programming experience on network representations of abstract programming concepts . International Journalof Man-Machine Studies, 29(4), 407 – 427.

Cotner, S., Fall, B., Wick, S., Walker, J., &Baepler, P. (2008). Instant feedback assessment methods: can we improve engagement, enjoyment, and preparation for exams inlarge-enrollment biology courses? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17, 437–443.

Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970–977.

Currens, J.B. and C.P. Bithell, The 2: 1 Clinical Placement Model:: Perceptions of clinical educators and students. Physiotherapy, 2003. 89(4): p. 204-218.

Czubaj, C. A. (2004). Literature review: reported educator concerns regarding cyberspace curricula.Education, 124(4), 676–683.

Dandavino, M., L. Snell, and J. Wiseman, Why medical students should learn how to teach. Medical Teacher, 2007. 29(6): p. 558-5 65.

Davis, M. A ., Curtis, M. B., &Tschetter, J. D. (2003). Evaluating cognitive training outcomes: validity and utility of structural knowledge assessment. Journal of Business andPsychology, 18,191– 206.

Deci, E.L, & Ryan, R.M. (1985).Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior . New York: Plenum Press.

Divitini, M., Hargalokken, O. K., &Norevid, P. (2002). Improving communication through mobile technologies: which possibilities? InThe IEEE international workshop on wireless and mobile technologies in education (WMTE’02).

Dochy, F., Segers, M. S. R., &Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer and coassessment in higher education: A literature review. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 331–350.

Draper, S. W., & Brown, M. I. (2004). Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 81–94.

Dvorak, J.D., &Burchanan, K. (2002,June). Using technology to create and enhance collaborative learning. In The 14th world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications (ED-MEDIA 2002), Denver, CO, USA.

Duff, A. (2003). Quality of learning on an MBA programme: the impact of approaches to learning on academicperformance. Educational Psychology, 23 (2), 123–139.

Dwyer, D. (1994). Apple classrooms of tomorrow: what we’ve learned. Retrieved 2002-3-12.

Elliott, N. and A. Higgins, Self and peer assessment-does it ma ke a difference to student group work? Nurse Education in Practice, 2005. 5(1): 40-48.

Elliot, A., McGregor, H., & Gable, S. (1999). Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: A mediational analysis. Journal of Education & Psychology, 91, 549–563.

Erickson, G., Peer evaluation as a teaching-learning strategy in baccalaureate education for community health nursing. The Journal of nursing education, 1987. 26(5): p. 204.

Entwistle, N. J., (1998). Approaches to learning and forms of understanding in Teaching and learning in higher education: From theory to practice, Ed. B. Dart & G. Boulton-Lewis, pp. 72-101, Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research, 0-86431-234-2.

Entwistle, N. (2000, December). Some aspects of the teaching–learning environment influencing approaches to studying. Paper presented at the first meeting of the Edinburgh-2000 Group, Edinburgh, UK.

Entwistle, N., McCune, V. and Hounsell, J. (2003). ‘Investigating ways of enhancing university teaching–learning environments: Measuring students’ approaches tostudying and perceptions of teaching’, in de Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., Entwistle, N.and van Merrienboer, J. (eds.), Powerful Learning Environments: Unravelling Basic Components and Dimensions,Oxford: Pergamon, pp. 89–107.

Falchikov, N. (1996, July). Improving learning through critical peer feedback and reflection. Paper presented at the HERDSA Conference 1996: Different approaches: Theory and practice in Higher Education, Perth, Australia.

Fawcett, L. M. and Garton, A. F. (2005). The effect of peer collab orationon child ren’s problem-s olvingability. British Journal of Education alPsycholog y 75, 157–169.

Furnham, A., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., &Moutafi, J. (2005). Personality and intelligence: gender, the Big Five, self-estimated and psychometric intelligence. International Journal of Selectionand Assessment, 13, 11–24.

Gardner,R.C.(2001).Integrative motivation and second language acquisition.In z.Dornyei,&R.Schmidt (Eds),Motivation and second language acquisition (pp.1-19). Honolulu:University Hawii.second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.

Garner, I., Francis, J., & Wales, K. (2002). An evaluation of the implementation of a short messaging system (SMS) to support undergraduate students. In The European workshop on mobile and contexual leaning, Birmingham, UK.

Garton, A. F. (2004). Exploring Cognitive Development: The Child as Problem Solver. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Geisler-Brenstein, E., Schmeck, R.R and  Hetherington, J. (1996). ‘An individual dif-ference  perspective on student diversity, Higher Education31, 73–96.

Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports  students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 3-31.

Gielen, S. (2007). Peer assessment as a tool for learning. Doctoral dissertation. Catholic University Leuven.

Glenn, D. C., Patel, F., Kutelieh, S., Robbins, J., Smigiel, H., & Wilson, A. (2011). Perceptions of optimal conditions for teaching and learning: a case study from Flinders University. Higher Education Research and Development (pp. 1–15). iFirst.

Goldsmith, T. E., Johnson, P. J., & Acton, W. H. (1991). Assessing structural knowledge.Journal of Educational Psychology, 83 (1), 88– 96.

Gomez, R. L., Hadfield, O. D., &Housner, L. D. (1996). Conceptual maps and simulated teaching episodes as indicators of competence in teaching elementary mathematicsJournal of Educational Psychology, 88 ,572– 585.

Gordon,S.(2009).Underprepared student: Challenges Facing College Faculty. Retrieved May 9,2009.

Graesser, A.C., Jackson, G.T., McDaniel, B., 2007. AutoTutor holds conversations with learners that are responsive to their cognitive and emotional states. Educational Technology 47, 19-22.

Graf, S., Lin, T., Kinshuk, J., 2008. The relationship between learning styles and cognitive traits getting additional information for improving student modelling. Computers in Human Behavior 24 (2), 122-137.

Greene, B.A. & Miller, R.B.(1996). Influences on course performance:Goals,perceoved ability, and self-regulation. Contemporary Educational Psychology.21,181-192.

Guzley, R. M., Avanzino, S., & Bor, A. (2001).Simulated computer-mediated/video interactive distancelearning: A test of motivation, interaction satisfaction, delivery, learning and perceived effectiveness.Journal of Computer Mediated Communication [Online],6(3). Retrieved July 25, 2009,from, http://jcmc.indiana.edu/ vol6/issue3/ guzley.html

HafizoahKassima , Howard Nicholasb, Wan Ngc(2014).Using a multimedia learning tool to improve creative performance.Journal of Thinking Skills and Creativity ,vol 13,9-13.Irani, T. (1998). Communication potential, information richness and attitude. ALN Magazine, 2(1).

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: a six-thousands student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. AmericanJournal of Physics, 66, 64–74.

Hansen, E. W., Stein, E. M., & May, V. V. (2008). Work in progress: Building community among first year engineering students. In Proceedings of 38th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Saratoga Springs, N.Y., Oct 22-25, 2008.

Haseman, W. D., Polatoglu, V. N., & Ramamurthy, K. (2002). An empirical investigation of the influences of the degree of interactivity of user-outcomes in a multimedia.environment. Information Resources Management Journal, 15(2), 31–48.

Hazrati-Viari A, Tayarani Rad A, Torabi S. 2012. The effect of personality traits on academic performance: The mediating role of academic motivation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 4th International Conference of Cognitive Science (ICCS 2011) 32 (2012) 367 – 371.

Herndon, M. K. & Hirt, J. B. (2004). Black students and their families: what leads to success in college.Journal of Black Students, 34(4), 489-513. Retrieved May 14, 2011.

Higgins, R., Hartley, P., & Skelton, A. (2002). The conscientious consumer; reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 53–64.

Hiller, T. B., & Hietapelto, A. B. (2001). Contract grading: encouraging commitment to the learning process through voice in the evaluation process. Journal of Management Education, 25, 660–684. http://beta.hec.gov.pk/InsideHEC/Divisions/QALI/ Others/Pages/StatisticalInformationUnit.aspx. Assessed 24.07.12.

Jackson, J. (2003). Case-based learning and reticence in a bilingual context: perceptions of business students in Hong Kong. System, 31, 457–469.

James, M., McCormick, R., Black, P., Carmichael, P., Drummond, M-J., Fox, A., Frost, D., MacBeath, J., Marshall, B., Pedder, D., Procter, R., Swaffield, S. and Wiliam, D. (2007). Improving Learning how to learn: classrooms, schools and Networks. London: Routledge.

Jawitz, J., & Case, J. (2009). Communicating your findings in engineering education: the value of making your theoretical perspectiveexplicit. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34(2), 149- 154.

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998). Cooperative learning returns to college: What evidence is there that it works?Change, July/August, 27-35.

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., Smith, K. A. (1991) Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity. ASHE-ERIC. Higher Education Report No. 4.Washington, D.C.: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.

Kashif M, Ayyaz M, Raza A, Hamid WS. (2013). Business undergraduates’ perceptions of motivation to learn:Empirical evidence from Pakistan. The International Journal of Management Education. 11: 75-84.

Kauffman, D. (2004). Effects of time perspective on student motivation: introduction to a special issue. Educational Psychology Review,16(1), 1–7.

Kember, D. (2000). Misconceptions about the learning approaches, motivation and study practices of asianstudents.Higher Education,40, 99–121.

Kenyon, L. and S. Peckover, 'A Juggling Act': an analysis of the impact of providing clinical placements for pre-registration students on theorganisation of community nursing and health visiting work. Nurse Educ Today, 2008. 28(2): p. 202-9.

Kimble, G.A., (1961). Hilgaral and marquis conditioning and learning(2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: prentice-Hall,5-6.

Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace. Koffka, K. (1922). Perception: and introduction to the Gestalt-theorie. Psychological Bulletin, 19, 531-585.

Kraithman,D.,& Bennett,S.(2005).Blending chalk talk and accessibility in an introductory economics module.Higher Education Academy Economics Network. Best Practice, 4(2), 12–15.

Kuhn, D. (1972). Mechanism of change in the development of cognitivestructures. Child Developme nt43, 833–844.

Laidra, K. , Pullmann, H. , & Allik, J. R. (2008). Personality and intelligence as predictors of academic achievement: A cross - sectional study from elementary to secondary school. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 441–451.

Lau, W. F., & Yuen, H. K. (2010). Promoting conceptual change of learning sorting algorithm through the diagnosis of mental models: the effects of gender and learning stylesComputers & Education, 54,275– 28.

Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991).Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-42374-0.

Leach,L,&Zepke,N.(2009July).Engaging first year student:aconceptual organizer for student engagement in paper presented at the 2009 first year in higher education conference.Brisbane ,Australia.Retrieved from. http://www.fyhe.qut.edu.au/past_papers/papers09/content/pdf/6A.pdf.

Leblanc,G.,& Nguyen,N.(1999).Listening to the customer’s voice:examining perceived service value among business college students.International Journal  of Educational Management ,13(4),187-198.

Levy, S. (2007). An inquiry into motivation using the case of Phaedrus demonstrator. Journal of Management Education, 31, 797–811.

Liu, T., Wang, H., Liang, J., Chan, T., & Yang, J. (2002). Applying wireless technologies to build a highly interactive learningenvironment. IEEE International Workshop on Wireles and Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE’02) (63), 70.

Liu, T., Liang, J., Wang, H., Chan, T., & Wei, L. (2003). Embedding educlick in classroom to enhance interaction. In Proceedings international conference computers in education(ICCE) (pp. 117–125). Hong Kong, China.

Liu, E. Z., Lin, S. S., Chiu, C. H., & Yuan, S. M. (2001).Web-based peer review: The learner as both adapter and reviewer. IEEE Transactions on Education, 44(3), 246−251.

Macallan, D.C., et al., A model of clinical problem based learning for clinical attachments in medicine. Medical education, 2009. 43(8): p.799- 807.

Martin, J. (2006) Personal knowledge management - the basis of corporate and institutional knowledge management, In: Managing Knowledge: Case Studies in Innovation, Martin, J. & Wright, K., Spotted Cow Press, Edmonton.

Marton, F., &Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning I: outcome and process. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11.

Masaali.s(2007).Relationship between reading study and academic achievement among students in IU .Doctoral Dissertation Isfahan.Khorasgan aslamic azad University.2007 [Persian].

Marton, F. & Säljö, R. (1997). Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D.J. Hounsell & N.J. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience oflearning: Implications for teaching and Studying in Higher Education (2nd ed.) (pp. 39-58). Edinburgh: Scottish AcademicPress.

Mau, W.C.(1997)." Parental influences on the high school students academic achievement: A comparison of Asian immigrants, Asian American, and white Americans. "Psychology in the schools 34: 267-277.

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning Second Edition.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 32 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10013-2473, USA.

Mayer, R. E., Stull, A., DeLeeuw, K., Almeroth, K., Bimber, B., Chun, D., et al. (2009). Clickers in collage classrooms: fostering learning with questioning methods in large lecture classes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 51–57.

McMillan, J. H. (2007). Formative classroom assessment: The Key to  improving student achievement.In J.H.McMillan (Ed.),Formative classroom assessment(pp.1-7). New York: Teachers College Press.

Middleton, E. B., & Loughead, T. A. (1993). Parental influence on career development: an integrative framework for adolescent career counseling. Journal of Career Development, 19, 161–173.

Mifsud, L. (2002). Alternative learning arenas – pedagogical challenges to mobile learning technology in education. In IEEE  international workshop on wireles and mobile technologies in education (WMTE’02), Vaexjoe, Sweden.

Miller,S.M.,&Miller ,K.L.(2000). Theoretical and practical consideration in the design of web-based instruction.In B.Abbey (Ed).Instructional and cognitive impacts of web-based education (pp.156-177).Hershey ,USA:Idea Group publishing.

Mohamadi Y (TRANSLATOR).[Educational psychology:theory and pra].Slavin RE (Author) Tehran :VIRAYESH.2006.[persian].

Moneta, G. (2004). The flow model of intrinsic motivation in chinese: cultural and personal moderators.Journal of Happiness Studies,5(2), 181–217.

Moore, J. L. (2000). Counseling African American men back to health. In L. Jones (Ed.), African American brothers of the academy: Up and coming black scholars earning our way in higher education (pp. 249 - 261). Sterling, VA: Stylus.

Muir-Herzig, R. (2004). Technology and its impact in the classroom. Computers and Education, 42, 111–131.

Narciss, S. (2008). Feedback strategies for interactive learning tasks. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Van Merrie¨nboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational xcommunications and technology (3rded.). (pp. 125e143) New York: Erlbaum.

Nardi, B., Whittaker, S., & Bradner, E., (2000). Interaction and outeraction: instant messaging in action. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work, (pp.79-88).Philadelphia,PA:ACM press.

Nicol, D., & Boyle, J. (2003). Peer instruction versus class-wide discussion in large   classes: a comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom. Studies of Higher Education, 28, 457–473

Nicolopoulou, A. and Richner, E. S. (2004). When your powerscombine, I am Captain Planet: The developmental significance ofindividua l and group authored stories by preschool ers. DiscourseStudies6 (3), 329–347.

Noe ,R.A. (1986). Trainee attributes and attitudes: Neglected influences on training effectiveness. Academy of Management Review, 11, 736–749.

Omidiyan.M.(TRANSLATOR).[Educationalpsychology].SantrockJW(Author)Yazd University.2006 .[persian].

Osborn, D. S. (2010). Using video lectures to teach a graduate career development course. In Gary R. Walsh, & Jeanne C. Bleur (Eds.), VISTAS (pp. 1-9). American Counseling Association. Retrieved from.

Parr, J.M. and M.A.R. Townsend, Environments, processes, and mechanisms in             peer learning* 1. International journal of education al research, 2002. 37(5):                p. 403-423.

Peets, A., et al., Involvement in teaching improves learning in medical students: a randomized  cross-over study. BMC medical education, 2009. 9(1): p. 55.

Perry, M.E., et al., Can training in musculoskeletal examination skills be effectively  delivered by undergraduate students as part of the standard curriculum? Rheumatology, 2010. 49(9): p. 1756.

Piombo, C., Batatia, H., Ayache, A., 2003, July. A framework for adapting  instruction to cognitive learning styles. In: Advanced Learning Technologies, 2003. Proceedings. The 3rd IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, pp. 434-435.

Pintrich, P., &Schunk, D. (1996). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and   applications. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Pintrich, P. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of EducationalResearch (31), 459–470.

Price, I., Matzdorf, F., Smith, L., & Agahi, H. (2003). The impact of facilities on student choice of university. Facilities, 21(10), 212–222.

Power, C., & Dunphy, K. (2010). Peer Facilitated Learning in Mathematics for Engineering: a Case Study from an Australian University. Engineering education,5(1),                75-84.

Ramsden, P. (1988). ‘Context and strategy: situational influences on learning’, inSchmeck, R.R., (ed.), Learning strategies and learning styles. New York: PlenumPress, pp. 159–184.

Resnick, L. B, Levine, J. M., & Teasley, S. D. (1991). (Eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. (pp.63 –82). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

Richardson, J.T.E., Morgan, A. and Woodley, A. (1999). ‘Approaches to studying indistance education’, Higher Education37, 23–55.

Reeves, T. C. (2000). Alternative assessment approaches for online learning environments in higher education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23 (1), 101 –111.

Richardson, J.T.E. (2000).Researching student learning.Buckingham: SRHE and OpenUniversity Press.

Riding, R., Rayner, S., 1999. Cognitive styles and learning strategies: understanding differences in learning and behavior. Educational Technology 15 (3), 222e241.

Rozendaal, J.S., De Brabander, C.J. and Minnaert, A. (2001, August). Boundaries anddimensionality of epistemological beliefs. Paper presented at the 9th Conference ofthe European Association for Research on Leaning and Instruction, Fribourg,Switzerland.

Rozendaal, J.S., de Brabander, C.J. & Minnaert, A. (2001, August). Boundaries and dimensionality of epistemological beliefs. In C.J. de Brabander (Chair), Personal epistemology: A search for conceptual clarification. Symposium conducted at the 9th biennial meeting of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction,Fribourg, Switzerland (17p + appendix).

Robinson, J. M. (1999). Anonymous peer review for classroom use: Results of a pilot in a large science unit. In Teaching in the Disciplines/ Learning in Context. Proceedings of the 8 tb Annual Teaching Learning Forum99. http://ctl.curtin.edu.au/professional_development/conferences/tlf/tlf1999/robinson-j.html.

Roblyer, M. D., &Wiencke, W. R. (2003). Design and use of a rubric to assess and encourage interactive qualities in distance courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 17(2), 77–98.

Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 299–323.

Schulze, E., & Tomal, A. (2006). The chilly classroom: beyond gender. College Teaching, 54(3), 263–269.

Schulze, E., & Tomal, A. (2006). The chilly classroom: beyond gender. College Teaching, 54(3), 263–269.

Shanoski,L, Hranitz, J. (2004). Learning from America's Best Teachers: Building a foundation for Accountability through excellence .

Severiens, S.E. and Ten Dam, G.T.M. (1997). ‘Gender and gender identity differences inlearning styles’, Educational Psychology17, 79–93.

Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on cooperativ e learning and achievement:What we know, what we need to know.Contemporary EducationalPsycholog y 21, 43–69.

Sluijsmans, D., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2002). Peer assessment training in teacher education: Effects on performance and perceptions. Assessment and Education in Higher Education, 27(5), 443−454.

Sims, R. (2003). Promises of interactivity: aligning learner perceptions and expectations with strategies for flexible and online learning. Distance Education, 24(1), 87–103.

Smith, P., & Smith, S. (1999). Differences between Chinese and Australian students: some implications for distance educators. DistanceEducation, 20 , 64–80.

Smith, S.M., & Woody, P.C. 2000, Interactive effect of multimedia instruction and learning styles,Teaching of Psychology, 27(3), 220-224.

Smith,F.M.,& Hausfaus,C.O.(1998).Relationship of family support and ethnic minority students achievement in science and mathematics .Science Ed-Ucation.82.111-125.

Smith, K.A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices. Journal ofEngineering Education, 94(1), 87-102.

Stefanou, C., & Salisbury-Glennon, J. (2002). Developing motivation and cognitive learning strategies through an undergraduate learningcommunity.Learning Environments Research, 5 ,77–97.

Steinert, Y., Student perceptions of effective small group teaching. Medical education, 2004. 38(3): p. 286-293.

Stone, M.E., & Jacobs, G. (2006). Supplemental instruction: new visions for empowering student learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 106, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Stone, A., & Briggs, J. (2002). ITZ GD 2 TXT – How to use SMS effectively in M-learning. In The European workshop on mobile andcontexual learning, Birmingham, UK

Stroud, K.C. (2006). Development  of  the  school motivation  and  learning strategies  inventory. Unpublished Dissertation. US: Texas A & M University. 1-200.

Tang, T. Y., &Mccalla, G. (2003). Smart recommendation for evolving e-learning system. In: 11th international conference on artificial intelligence in education , Workshop  on technologies for electronic documents for supporting learning, July 20-24, Sydney, Australia pp. 699– 710.

Ten Cate, O. and S. Durning, Peer teaching  in medical education: twelve reasons to move from theory to practice. Medical Teacher, 2007. 29(6): p. 591-599.

Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer Assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 20–27.

Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68, 249−276.

Topping, K., Smith, F. F., Swanson, I., & Elliot, A. (2000). Formative peer assessment ofacademic writing between postgraduate students. Assessment and Evaluation inHigher Education, 25(2), 149−169.

Topping, K.J. and S.W. Ehly, Peer-assisted learning. 1998: Lawrence Erlbaum.Trigwell, K., Prosser, M. and Waterhouse, F. (1999). ‘Relations between teachers’approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning’, Higher Education37,57–70.

Trees, A. R., & Jackson, M. H. (2007). The learning environment in clicker classrooms: student processes of learning and involvement in large university-level courses using student response systems. Learning, Media and Technology, 32, 21–40.

Trifonova, A. (2003) Mobile learning – review of the literature. Technical report DIT-03-009, Informatica e Telecomunicazioni, University of Trento.

Trottier, R.W., A Peer-Assisted Learning System ('PALS') approach to teaching basic sciences. A model developed in basic medical pharmacology instruction. Medical Teacher, 1999. 21(1): p. 43-47.

Vaill, P. B. (2007). F. J. Roethlisberger and the elusive phenomena of organizational behavior. Journal of Management Education, 31, 321–338.

Valle, A., Cabanach, R., Nunez, J., Gonzalez-Pienda, J., Rodriguez, S., &Pineiro, I. (2003). Cognitive, motivational, and volitionaldimensions of learning.Research in Higher Education, 44(5), 557–580.

Van Wynen E.(1997) [Information processing style: One size does not fit all]. Nurse educator, 22 (5), 44-48.

Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., &Deci, E. L. (2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: The synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 246–260.

VanderStoep, S.W., Pintrich, P. and Fagerlin, A. (1996). ‘Disciplinary differences in self-regulated learning in college students’, Contemporary Educational Psychology 21,345–362.

Vansteenkiste,M.,Sierens,E.,Soenens,B.,Luyckx,K.,&Lens,W.(2009).Motivational profiles from a self-determination perspective:The quality of motivation matters Journal of Educational Psychology,101,671-688.

Vermetten, Y.J., Lodewijks, H.G. and Vermunt, J.D. (2001). ‘The role of personalitytraits and goal orientations in strategy use’, Contemporary Educational Psychology26, 149–170.

Vermunt, J.D. (1996). ‘Metacognitive, cognitive and affective aspects of  learning stylesand strategies: A phenomenographicanalysis’,Higher Education31, 25–50.

Vermunt, J.D. (2003). ‘The power of  learning environments and the quality of studentlearning. in de Corte’, E., Verschaffel, L., Entwistle, N. and van Merrie¨nboer,J. (eds.), Powerful Learning Environments: Unravelling Basic Components andDimensions,Oxford: Pergamon, pp. 107–122.

Vermunt, J. D., &Vermetten, Y. (2004). Patterns in student learning: Relationships between learning strategies, conceptions of  learning, and learning orientations. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 359–384.

Vermunt, J.D. and Verloop, N. (1999). ‘Congruence and friction between learning andteaching’, Learning and Instruction 9, 257–280.

Vermeer, H. (1997). Sixth-grade students' mathematical problem-solving behavior. Doctoral Dissertation,Leiden University, The Netherlands.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychologicalprocesses (M. Cole, V John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman,Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wadoodi, A. and J.R. Crosby. (2004). Twelve tips for peer-assisted learning: a classic concept revisited. Med Teach. 24(3): p. 241-4.

Wood, D.F., Problem based learning. Bmj, 2003. 326(7384): p. 328.Wotton, K. and J. Gonda, Clinician and student evaluation of a collaborative clinical teaching model. Nurse EducPract, 2004. 4(2): p. 120-7.

Xu, R. (2004). Chinese Mainland Students’ experiences of teaching and learning at a Chinese University: some emerging findings. In BERA 2004 conference, Manchester. 15-18 September 2004. www.ed.ac.uk/etl/publications.html, p.1-18.

Young MR ,Klemz BR, Murphy JW. Enhancing learning outcomes: the effects of instructional technology, learning styles, instructional methods, and student behavior. J Mark Educ 2003 ;25(2):130-42.

Yong, S.T, & Lew, T.Y,. (2005). Deep learning approach among marketing students: Adult versus youth learners:Adult versus youth learners. http://conference.herdsa.org.au/2005/pdf/non_refereed/082.pdf.

Zagorsky, J. (1997). E-mail, computer usage and college students: a case study .Education, 118(1), 47–56.

Zeegers, P. (2001). ‘Approaches to learning in science: A longitudinal study’ ,British Journal of  Educational Psychology 71, 115–132.

Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-efficacy and educational development. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 202–231). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Zimmerman, B. J., &Risemberg, R. (1997). Becoming a self-regulated writer: A social cognitive perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 73–101.