فهرست:
مقدمه
فصل اول :کلیات و مرورمقالات
کلیات : تعریف ایمپلنت
ساختارایمپلنت
موادتشکیل دهنده ایمپلنت
طرح ایمپلنت
شکل بدنه ایمپلنت
توپوگرافی سطحی ایمپلنت
فاکتورهای کلیدی حصول اسئواینتگریشن
فاکتورهای مرتبط باعدم حصول اسئواینتگریشن
الف)– عوامل داخلی
ب) – فاکتورهای مربوط به عمل کننده
ج) – فاکتورهای مرتبط با بیومتریال
معرفی سیستمSPI
مرورمقالات :
فصل دوم : بیان مسئله
بیان مسئله
هدف کلی
اهداف جزئی
اهداف کاربردی
فصل سوم : مواد و روشها
نوع مطالعه
حجم نمونه
روش کار
«بررسی تعدادی ازمتغیرهای مهم »
1.تحلیل استخوان
2.عمق پاکت
3.وجود التهاب لثه
آنالیزآماری
فصل چهارم : نتایج
مقایسه میزان تحلیل استخوان اطراف ایمپلنتهای استوانه ای و مخروطی
مقایسه عمق پاکت اطراف ایمپلنتهای استوانه ای و مخروطی
مقایسه خونریزی حین پروب کردن (BOP) اطراف ایمپلنت های استوانه ای و مخروطی
مقایسه تغییرات استخوان برحسب فک بالا و پایین
مقایسه تغییرات عمق پاکت برحسب فک بالا و پایین
فصل پنجم : بحث
بحث
نتیجه گیری وپیشنهادات
نتیجه گیری
پیشنهادات
منابع
منبع:
1) Zwemer TJ. Mosby's dental dictionary, 1sted, St.Louis, Mosby, 1998: 254 - 55.
2) Newman WA. Dorland's medical dictionary, 27th ed, Philadelphia,W.B.5aunders Co, 1994: 827 - 28.
3) Babbush CA. Endosteal, mucosal, subperiosteal and transosseous implants in Laskin DM (editor), Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 2nded, Philadelphia, W.B.5aunders Co, 1995: 438 - 40.
4) Misch CEo Generic Root Form Component Terminology. In:
Misch's Contemporary Implant Dcntistry.Bv' ed, St.Louis, Mosby,
2008: 26 - 37.
5) Klokkevold PR, Cochran DL. Clinical Aspects and Evaluation of The Implant Patient. In: Newman MG, Takei HH,Klokkevold PR, Carranza FA Carranza's Clinical Periodontology, 10th ed, Philadelphia, W.B.5aunders Co, 2006; 1087 - 104.
6)Buser D, Nydegger T, Hirt HP, Cochran DL, Nolte LP. Removal
torque values of titatium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998 Sep - Oct; 13(5): 611-9.
7) Ericsson I, Johansson Cli, Bystedt H, Norton MR.
A histomorphometric evaluation of bone - to - implant contact on machine - prepared and roughened titanium dental implants.
A pilot study in dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994 Dec; 5 (4): 202-6.
8) Klokkevold PR, Nishimura RD, Adachi M, Caputo A. Osseointegration enhanced by chemical etching of the titanium surface. Torque removal study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997 Dec; 8 (6): 422 - 7.
9) Misch CE, Strong JT, bidez MW. Scientific Rationale for Dental
Implant Design. In: Misch's Contemporary Implant Dentistry, 3rded, St.Louis, Mosby, 2008; 200 - 29.
10) Biesbrock AR, Edgerton M. Evaluation of the clinical predictability of hydroxyapatite-coate endosseous dental implants:
A review of literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995 Nov - Dec; 10: 712 - 20.
11) Ellingsen JE. Surface configurations of dental implants. J Periodontal 2000 1998 Jun; 17: 36 - 46.
12) Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm V, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (II) Etiopathogenesis. Eur J Oral Sci 1998 June; 106 (3): 721- 64.
13) Mailath G, Stoiber B, Watzek G, Matejka M. Bone resorption at the entry of
osseointegrated implants-a biomechanical phenomenon. Finite element study. Z
Stomatol 1989; 86(4): 207-16
14) Siegele D, Solte´sz U. Numerical investigations of the influence of implant
shape on stress distribution in the jaw bone.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:333–340.
15) Rieger MR, Mayberry M, Brose MO. Finite element analysis of six
endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1990; 63(6): 671-6.
16) Andersson B. Implants for single-tooth replacement. A clinical and
experimental study on the Brånemark CeraOne System. Swed Dent J Suppl.
1995;108:1-41
17) Friberg B, Sennerby L, Roos J, Johansson P, Strid CG, Lekholm U.
Evaluation of bone density using cutting resistance measurements and
microradiography: an in vitro
study in pig ribs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1995;6:164–171.
18) Jokstad A, Braegger U, Brunski J,Carr A, Naert I et al. Quality of dental
implants.Int J of prosthodont.2004;17(6):607-641
19) O'Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Meredith N. Influence of implant taper on the
primary and secondary stability of osseointegrated titanium implants.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15(4):474-80
20) KaroussisI, BräggerU, SalviG, Bürgin W, Lang N. Effect of implant design
on survival and success rates of titanium oral implants: a 10-year prospective
cohort study of the ITI® Dental Implant System.Clin Oral Implants Res
2004;15: 8–17
21) Petrie C, Williams J. Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence
of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16(4):486-94.
22) O’Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Meredith N. Measurements comparing the initial
stability of five designs of dental implants: a human cadaver study. Clin Implant
Dent Relat Res. 2000;2:85–92.
23) Saadoun AP, Le Gall MG, Touati B. Current trends in implantology: part
1—biological response, implant stability, and implant design.
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2004;16:529–535.
24) Ormianer Z, Palti A. Long-term clinical evaluation of tapered multi-threaded
implants: results and influences of potential risk factors. J Oral Implantol.
2006;32(6):300-307
25) CruzM, LourençoA, ToledoE, Barra L , Lemonge A et al. Finite element
stress analysis of cuneiform and cylindrical threaded implant geometries.
Technol Health Care. 2006;14(4-5):421-38
26) Huang HL, Chang CH, Hsu JT, Fallgatter AM, KoCC. Comparison of
implant body designs and threaded designs of dental implants: a 3-dimensional
finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22(4): 551-62.
27) Khayat P, Milliez S. Prospective Clinical Evaluation of 835 Multithreaded
Tapered Screw-Vent Implants: Results After Two Years of Functional Loading.
J Oral Implantology 2007; 33( 4): 225-231.
28) Kim J, Baekb S, Kimc T, Changc Y. Comparison of Stability between
Cylindrical and Conical Type Mini-Implants.
Angle Orthodontist 2008; 78(4):692-698
29) Ormianer Z, Palti A. Retrospective clinical evaluation of tapered screw-vent
implants: results after up to eight years of clinical function. J Oral Implantol.
2008;34(3):150-60
30) Baggi L, Cappelloni I, Di Girolamo M, Maceri F, Vairo G. The influence of
implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants
related to crestal bone geometry.J Prosthet Dent. 2008;100(6):422-31
31) Nedir R, Nurdin N, Szmukler-Moncler S, Bischof M.Placement of tapered
implants using an osteotome sinus floor elevation technique without bone
grafting: 1-year results. J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24(4):727-33
32) Kim YKim S, Kim J, Yi Y, Yun P.Prospective study of tapered resorbable
blasting media surface implant stability in the maxillary posterior area.
J Oral surg.2012
33) Rismanchian M, Birang R, Shahmoradi M, Talebi H, Jabar Zare R.
Developing a New Dental Implant Design and Comparing its Biomechanical
Features with Four Designs. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2010; 7(2): 70–75.
34) Kitamura E, Stegaroiu R, Nomura S, Miyakawa O. Influence of marginal
bone resorption on stress around an implant – a three-dimensional finite element
analysis. J of Oral Rehabilitation 2005; 32: 279–286
35) Cochran D. A Comparison of Endosseous Dental Implant Surfaces .
J Periodontol 1999; 70(12): 1523-153
36) Steigenga J, Al-Shammari Kh, Nociti F, Misch C, Wang H. Dental Implant
Design and Its Relationship to Long-Term Implant Success. Implant Dent
2003;12(4):306-317.
37) Sanfilippo F, Bianchi A.Osteoporosis: the effect on maxillary bone
resorption and therapeutic possibilities by means of implant prostheses: A
literature review and clinical considerations.Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent
2003;23(5):447-57.
38) Misch, CE. Implant Design Considerations for the Posterior Regions of the
Mouth.Ann Periodontol 2000;5:22-31.
39) Penarrocha M, Guarinos J, Sanchis J, Balaguer J. Retrospective study
(1994-1999) of 441 ITI implants in 114 patients follow up during an
average of 2.3 years. Med Oral 2002;7(2):144-55.
40) Urdaneta RA, Leary J, Lubelski W, Emanuel KM, Chuang SK. The Effect
of Implant Size 5 x 8 mm on Crestal Bone Levels Around Single-Tooth Implant.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 16(4):486-94.
41) Ojeda J, Martínez-Reina J, García-Aznar JM, Domínguez J, Doblaré M.
Numerical simulation of bone remodelling around dental implants. Proc Inst
Mech Eng H. 2011;225(9):897-906.
42) Teixeira E,Sato Y,Akagawa Y,Kimoto T. Correlation between
mucosal inflammation and marginal bone loss around hydroxyapatite-
coated implant: A 3-year cross sectional study.Int J Oral Maxillofac
Implants 1997;12(1)74-81.
43) Charyeva O, Altynbekov K, Zhartybaev R, Sabdanaliev A . Long-term
dental implant success and survival--a clinical study after an observation period
up to 6 years. Swed Dent J. 2012;36(1):1-6.
44) Heinemann F, Bourauel C, Hasan I, Gedrange T. Influence of the implant
cervical topography on the crestal bone resorption and immediate implant
survival. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2009;60 Suppl 8:99-105
45) BratuE, Tandlich M, Shapira L. A rough surface implant neck with
microthreads reduces the amountof marginal bone loss: a prospective clinical
study.Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20(8): 827–832
46) Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T. Effects of different implant surfaces and
designs on marginal bone-level alterations: a review. Clin Oral Implants Res.
2009;20 Suppl 4:207-15
47) Nickenig HJ, Wichmann M, Schlegel KA, Nkenke E, Eitner S.
Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone levels adjacent to parallel-screw
cylinder machined-neck implants and rough-surfaced microthreaded implants
using digitized panoramic radiographs.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(6):550-
554.
48) Kim J, Lee D, Kim C, Park K,Moon I.Effect of conical configuration of
fixture on the maintenance of marginal bone level: preliminary results at 1 year
of function. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21(4):439-44
49) Aloy-Prósper A, Maestre-Ferrín L, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Peñarrocha-Diago.
Marginal bone loss in relation to the implant neck surface: an update. Med Oral
Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011;16(3): 365-368.
50) Hermann J, Buser D, Schenk R, Cochran D. Crestal bone changes around
titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and
submerged implants in the canine mandible.J Periodontol. 2006;71(9):1412-24.
51) Baumgarten H, Cocchetto R, Testori T, Meltzer A, Porter S. A new implant
design for crestal bone preservation: Initial observations and case report. Pract
Proced Aesthet Dent 2005;17:735-40.
52) Calvo-Guirado JL, Ortiz-Ruiz AJ, Lopez-Mari L, Delgado-Ruiz R, Mate-
Sanchez J, Gonzalez LA. Immediate maxillary restoration of single-tooth
implants using platform switching for crestal bone preservation: A 12-month
study. Int J Oral and Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:275-81.
53) Rodriguez-Ciurana X, Vela- Nebot X, Segala-Torres M, Rodado-Alonso C,
Mendez-Blanco V, Mata-Bugueroles M. Biomechanical repercussions of bone
resorption related to biologic width: A finite element analysis of three implant-
abutment configurations. Int J Perio Restorat Dent 2009;29:479-87.
54) Enkling N, Jöhren P, Klimberg V, Bayer S, Mericske-Stern R, Jepsen S.
Effect of platform switching on peri-implant bone levels: a randomized clinical
trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(10):1185-92.
55) Quirynen M. The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on
supra- and subgingival plaque formation in man. A review of the literature. J
Clin Periodontol 1995;22:1-14.
56) Piatelli A, Vrespa G et al. Role of the microgap between implant and
abutment: A retrospective histologic evaluation in monkeys.J Periodontal
2003;74(3):346-52
57) Broggini N, McManus L et al. Persistant acute inflammation at the implant-
abutment interface. J Dent Res 2003; 82(3):232-7
58) Weng D, Nagata M et al. Influence of microgap location and configuration
on the periimplant bone morphology in submerged implants. An experimental
study in dogs.Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19(11):1141-7
59) Akagawa Y, Takata T, Nikai H, Tsuru H. Correlation between clinical and
histological evaluation of the peri-implant gingiva around the single - crystal
sapphaire endosseous Implant. J Oral Rehabil 1989; 16(6): 581-7